Health and Illness in the Richest Country in the World
- Unlike all high income and most middle income countries, the United States have never made universal healthcare a social right.
- Instead, healthcare is offered through a complex mix of public and private coverage that affords no consistency
- Market-based, for profit industry dominated by insurance giants and drug companies
- This has resulted in the highest healthcare spending per capita in the world and mediocore health outcomes.
- The US has lower life expectancy and positive health outcomes than any other developed nation in the world. Scores much lower on managing chronic disease
- The US has the lowest access to primary care of any developed (and some developing) nations
- Lack of access to health insurance coverge (universal coverage) is the main cause
- exacerbates illness
- shortens lives
- increases suffering
ACA as a response to restricted access
- Increase access by expanding access to medicaid (non-group coverage)
- Creating insurance exchanges to sell affordable healthcare
- Using federal monies to finance programs rather than a hodgepodge of state formulas which left most care un- or under-funded.
- Prohibited
- denying coverage because of preexisting conditions
- charging higher prices for women (gender range)
- canceling coverage after it was issued (excision)
- not including a comprehensive packege of basic services (minimum coverage)
- Protected Insurance Companies
- Risk pooling (risk adjustment, risk corridors, reinsurance
- Provided subsidies and tax credits to keep market affordable
- Problem with Implementation
- 2012 supreme court decision made medicare expansion optional for states
- less than 100% below poverty was now ineligible for financial assistance
- left a new group of poor and uninsured
- "coverege gap" for which people blamed obamacare rather than the states that didn't expand medicare by their own choice- even though the government would have paid 100% of it (for the first two years)
- remains politically contentious which is responsible for its partial and tentative rollout and its lack of acceptance.
The Anthropological Approach to Healthcare Access
- concerned with individual phenomonology as opposed to generalization
- qualitative rather than quantitative data
- shows how differently situated individuals have radically different experiences and these are all valid.
- responsive to multiple points of view
- Three theoretical concerns when understanding access post-ACA
- stratified citizenship- the uneven ways in which people experienced the law
- factors: immigration, race, age, income, gender, state of residence
- health citizenship: social inclusion and marginalization are often produced through unequal access to healthcare, structural barriers to health, and provider attitudes.
- differential notions of "deservedness"
- risk-class membership, sense of vulnerability, social resources
- how it is experienced and navigated in health care
- perceived health risks shape coverage behaviors
- people are also "risks" -subject to subprime rates for healthcare with incomplete coverage and high deductibles (average $3000).
- responsibility- ACA provided new responsibilities for individuals and new opportunities for companies to make money
- healthcare now an individual responsibility rather than an employment perk or universal right- individual mandate
- part of the larger history of welfare reform
- put more responsibility on states for healthcare delivery
- unequally distributed increase in responsibility for healthcare and improved health outcomes falls on the most vulnerable and those in the coverage gap.

No comments:
Post a Comment